It was probably better for society back when there was ridicule attached to UFO reports, rather than taking them seriously, like is becoming popular now. That is because, as the Bible tells us, there are forces smarter than human which want to destroy humanity with deceit. Science is dependent on human understanding, and cannot tell us what these things really are, so the smarter forces can define them and we cannot know better.
1 Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:
1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LordGod had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
3 But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
NASA cooperates with SETI, setting up the public for the return of the evil fallen angels from before the Flood as their saviors.
// Most scientists agree that a finding like this (intelligent ET life) would alter and transform the status quo in many ways–what would be its effect on our society–our science, our technology, or our religion?
So for me detecting another civilization is a way of coming to a better understanding of who we are as human beings. It would mean a chance to see whether the ways of knowing that we’ve developed here on earth—our math, our science, our ways of expressing ourselves, our music, our art–are they somehow tapping into something that goes beyond earth or are they uniquely ours?
The discovery would be on the same level as those of Copernicus and Darwin and as of the transforming events in human history. However it will be decades before people get used to the idea that we are not alone in the universe, and its real meaning becomes deeply ingrained as occurred with the heliocentric cosmology and biological evolution… //
–Douglas A. Vakoch, Ph.D., SETI
In this youtube video, an entity makes eye contact with a woman, which she compares to the Egyptian dog god Anubis, for which she is overwhelmed with reverence. These modern entities called Bigfoot and Dogman are consistent with what the ancients experienced as their gods.
Steve Quayle is falling for the concept of space and time travel, which seems to be an implanted memory that is being placed into certain selected, highly intelligent people by something. Here he interviews another official who claims to have been to Mars on a space elevator. Remember Captain Randy Cramer. These people may even have been somewhere, but it certainly is compatible with an elaborate deception by things smarter than humans.
Corey Goode seems to have ambitions to be a leader in a new worldwide UFO religious cult. He claims to be in contact with the “good” aliens.
Some people take the face on Mars seriously as evidence of intervention by space aliens, who constructed it and other interesting anomalies. This is a face that appeared on Google Earth in my family cemetery, which is evidence to me that the face on Mars is created by humans, the same way that humans see Bigfoot, and even see him very clearly, and can talk to him, but can never actually present him to the scientists. There is an intelligence that creates things, but it is not ETs. It seems that there are unknown nonhuman entities acting in the universe, but they need not be physical ETs.
The Bigfoot-Dogman-UFO phenomenon could be seen as a projection of human fear and guilt onto the natural world. That may be a large part of what people are seeing, but I don’t think we can rule out the idea that something is actually there. It is not likely to be an undiscovered hominid, however. I expect it is best thought of as the same thing the ancient people experienced as “gods,” whatever that was.
The atheist cannot accept the concept of objective guilt, as far as I can tell. There can be no objective morality, and morality is only whatever the society chooses to enforce, which may change as fashions change. Yet many atheists believe in Bigfoot, in the sense of an undiscovered hominid, or primitive man-ape. This makes the god controllable, and makes him less than man.
This accounts for the popularity of Bigfoot as a subject of ridicule or nothing but an undiscovered species of ape. It is a way of ignoring one’s fear and guilt for not measuring up to objective standards of morality. It is a way of dismissing the gods, or God Himself, and His infinite demands on man for absolute perfection. It is an attempt at ignoring the issue, and dismissing the need for the righteousness of Christ to make one acceptable to Truth Itself, so that one can be in the presence of God in heaven.