Science as dogmatic religion

Facebook censors don’t want anyone reading this paper about low cloud cover and its effect on temperature, questioning the current man-caused climate change dogma. They are trying to intimidate admins into not posting it by threatening to downlist any group that posts it. This is the same thing as the Roman Catholic Church trying to stamp out opposition to the dogma of the Magisterium in the dark ages before the Reformation.

I observe that many people are not sure about what they believe, and consequently have to push their beliefs on others by force, in order to make the unsure person feel better about his belief. Rational discussion is the enemy of such people.

Notice from Facebook:
“Partly False Information Found in Creationist Particle Physics

“Ed Garrett shared information that’s been reviewed by TjekDet and Science Feedback. We’ve added a notice to the post so others can see that it’s partly false. Learn More about how fact-checking works on Facebook.

“To fight false news, Facebook pushes misleading content farther down in News Feed and provides additional articles on the same topic.

“If a group repeatedly shares false news, Facebook may push all of that group’s content down in News Feed, which may mean fewer people visit the group. Facebook may also stop suggesting that people join the group.”

From the paper:
Abstract. In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.

Bigfoot as a forest spirit

A quote from the website below--

// If Sasquatch is some type of ghost or spirit entity it sure would explain a lot. We wouldn’t expect to find a living specimen, or a body, bones or even a fossil record. Ghostly calls in the night would be par for the course we would think, and even footprints left behind and tossed rocks and sticks aren’t outside of the norm for the standard supernatural apparition.

More than anything, it would explain why sightings are so fleeting, and why, even with the woods crawling with people (some of them looking for him), Bigfoot has never been properly documented.

It’s because he isn’t really there. At least not in the way we’re used to thinking.

Native American legends are often cited as proof that Sasquatch exists in North America. After all, if people have been seeing him for thousands of years, he must really be out there. But many indigenous Bigfoot legends mix the spiritual world with the biological world, and accounts of Bigfoot with shape-shifting abilities, or the powers of invisibility, are not uncommon.//

The photo is of a stump pretending to be Bigfoot.


UFOs are science now

It was probably better for society back when there was ridicule attached to UFO reports, rather than taking them seriously, like is becoming popular now. That is because, as the Bible tells us, there are forces smarter than human which want to destroy humanity with deceit. Science is dependent on human understanding, and cannot tell us what these things really are, so the smarter forces can define them and we cannot know better.
1 Peter 5:8 Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour:

Genesis 3
1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LordGod had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?

And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:

But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:

For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.


NASA cooperates with SETI, setting up the public for the return of the evil fallen angels from before the Flood as their saviors.

// Most scientists agree that a finding like this (intelligent ET life) would alter and transform the status quo in many ways–what would be its effect on our society–our science, our technology, or our religion?

So for me detecting another civilization is a way of coming to a better understanding of who we are as human beings. It would mean a chance to see whether the ways of knowing that we’ve developed here on earth—our math, our science, our ways of expressing ourselves, our music, our art–are they somehow tapping into something that goes beyond earth or are they uniquely ours?

The discovery would be on the same level as those of Copernicus and Darwin and as of the transforming events in human history. However it will be decades before people get used to the idea that we are not alone in the universe, and its real meaning becomes deeply ingrained as occurred with the heliocentric cosmology and biological evolution… //

–Douglas A. Vakoch, Ph.D., SETI

Mars simulation

These are simulations of BEING on Mars, not the far more cramped and dangerous process of getting there. They still go wrong. Less than complete perfection in space means death. It is like getting to heaven. Only God can make you acceptable to be with Him. One cannot do all that is required.

Why do they not simulate the process of GOING to Mars? That has to happen first. I can only conclude that it is because NASA and the private companies involved are not serious about going to Mars in the first place, and are only using the idea to get people to support them and give them money.