This photo above is the only part of the giant ape that the scientific community calls Gigantopithecus that has been found, except scattered teeth. It looks rather human, don’t you think? Maybe they just don’t recognize that they have the jawbone of a real giant? The photo is from the History Channel.
This is a gorilla jawbone. Note the large canines not found in the Giganto jaw. I understand they have never been able to get DNA from a Giganto bone or tooth. But if they got human DNA from it, they would just think it was contamination, and not report it. So that would be consistent with at least some of these bones and teeth being from giant humans.
Facebook censors don’t want anyone reading this paper about low cloud cover and its effect on temperature, questioning the current man-caused climate change dogma. They are trying to intimidate admins into not posting it by threatening to downlist any group that posts it. This is the same thing as the Roman Catholic Church trying to stamp out opposition to the dogma of the Magisterium in the dark ages before the Reformation.
I observe that many people are not sure about what they believe, and consequently have to push their beliefs on others by force, in order to make the unsure person feel better about his belief. Rational discussion is the enemy of such people.
Notice from Facebook:
“Partly False Information Found in Creationist Particle Physics
“Ed Garrett shared information that’s been reviewed by TjekDet and Science Feedback. We’ve added a notice to the post so others can see that it’s partly false. Learn More about how fact-checking works on Facebook.
“To fight false news, Facebook pushes misleading content farther down in News Feed and provides additional articles on the same topic.
“If a group repeatedly shares false news, Facebook may push all of that group’s content down in News Feed, which may mean fewer people visit the group. Facebook may also stop suggesting that people join the group.”
From the paper:
Abstract. In this paper we will prove that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the influences of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. That is why those models give a very small natural temperature change leaving a very large change for the contribution of the green house gases in the observed temperature. This is the reason why IPCC has to use a very large sensitivity to compensate a too small natural component. Further they have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds in order to magnify the sensitivity. In addition, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.
A quote from the website below--
// If Sasquatch is some type of ghost or spirit entity it sure would explain a lot. We wouldn’t expect to find a living specimen, or a body, bones or even a fossil record. Ghostly calls in the night would be par for the course we would think, and even footprints left behind and tossed rocks and sticks aren’t outside of the norm for the standard supernatural apparition.
More than anything, it would explain why sightings are so fleeting, and why, even with the woods crawling with people (some of them looking for him), Bigfoot has never been properly documented.
It’s because he isn’t really there. At least not in the way we’re used to thinking.
Native American legends are often cited as proof that Sasquatch exists in North America. After all, if people have been seeing him for thousands of years, he must really be out there. But many indigenous Bigfoot legends mix the spiritual world with the biological world, and accounts of Bigfoot with shape-shifting abilities, or the powers of invisibility, are not uncommon.//
The photo is of a stump pretending to be Bigfoot.