Smoke detector radiation

The radiation at a smoke detector was determined by an AA experiment to be about three times background, 45 counts per minute versus 14. The geiger counter’s sensor has to be directly over the Americium 241 to detect that level. Even laying the instrument on top of the smoke detector does not result in a noticeable increase in CPM.

Evaluating Dinosaur Mythology


A three-toed dinosaur trackway was discovered north of Nashville on the property of a gypsum operation. It was investigated by the University of Arkansas for this article from 2012.

From the article– // The researchers are using a high-resolution scanner perched atop a cherry picker to create a precise digital map of the location of the prints within the landscape. The technology not only allows measurements of the prints themselves within six millimeter accuracy, but it also maps the prints in relation to one another – something that could take months to do using old-fashioned techniques.
“If you are trying to understand where the tracks go and
the relationship between the various tracks, it is better to see everything at once,” Cothren says. “The laser scan will give you the ability to look at the entire site from an aerial perspective, zoom in on the areas that you are interested in and map out features that you may have missed because they are too difficult to see in the monochrome limestone here.”
The scans will be made available to paleontologists and other interested individuals wanting to study the site so they will be able to make a virtual visit to the site without having to travel to the site itself. //

A video from the U of A about the site, based on the current mythology of dinosaur evolution and extinction.

Wine as a fire extinguisher

Screen Shot 2017-02-23 at 7.20.38 AM.pngA pastor said that wine is so evil that it would not put out a fire. Of course, Astrobiology Associates had to test that. This photo is a still from the video on Facebook. We found that a mixture of water even with 23% alcohol would put out a fire, even though it flames up at first. I don’t know of a wine with a higher percentage of alcohol.


Applied to the burning starter log with a plastic pipette, in a fireplace. Only 30 ml was used, and it still put out the fire.


Bigfoot as god


The Bigfoot-Dogman-UFO phenomenon could be seen as a projection of human fear and guilt onto the natural world. That may be a large part of what people are seeing, but I don’t think we can rule out the idea that something is actually there. It is not likely to be an undiscovered hominid, however. I expect it is best thought of as the same thing the ancient people experienced as “gods,” whatever that was.

The atheist cannot accept the concept of objective guilt, as far as I can tell. There can be no objective morality, and morality is only whatever the society chooses to enforce, which may change as fashions change. Yet many atheists believe in Bigfoot, in the sense of an undiscovered hominid, or primitive man-ape. This makes the god controllable, and makes him less than man.

This accounts for the popularity of Bigfoot as a subject of ridicule or nothing but an undiscovered species of ape. It is a way of ignoring one’s fear and guilt for not measuring up to objective standards of morality. It is a way of dismissing the gods, or God Himself, and His infinite demands on man for absolute perfection. It is an attempt at ignoring the issue, and dismissing the need for the righteousness of Christ to make one acceptable to Truth Itself, so that one can be in the presence of God in heaven.

Darwin Day–February 12

The human senses are easily fooled, and that is why science cannot be trusted to give final answers about anything.

February 12, 1809, was the day of birth of the brilliant genius Charles Darwin, the man who created the mythology of rocks evolving into humans, and with a great deal of help from atheists, succeeded in getting it taught in public schools as if it were science.

Can we trust science?

A worker adjusts a diorama at Kennedy Space Center: A reminder of how easily human perception could be tricked by smarter superincumbent nonhuman entities, or even other humans.

The “science” that developed from the Enlightenment was atheistic dogmatism, a Satan-inspired (Genesist 3:5) attempt to find final answers about reality after presupposing that there could be no God in the Biblical sense. True science–observation and experimentation to develop better ways of dealing with reality–came from Christianity.

National Geographic is disturbed that people don’t trust science as their substitute for God, and become atheists who mistake scientific observation for final reality like their writers do.

The funny thing is that the National Geographic writer admits that science cannot give final answers. “Scientific results are always provisional, susceptible to being overturned by some future experiment or observation. Scientists rarely proclaim an absolute truth or absolute certainty. Uncertainty is inevitable at the frontiers of knowledge.”

Yet he feels free to pronounce the idea that there is nothing special about the earth, biological evolution, and man-caused global warming as absolute certainties, based on highly contested atheistic dogma and hysteria, not on careful scientific observation.  He even admits that science cannot convince people of the truth of such issues, and says that promoters of them must resort to political advocacy and other deceit, not science. So of course science cannot be trusted to give final answers about anything. That is not its purpose. Atheism is what gives him final answers, as in any religion. It is a matter of where one’s faith resides.