NASA cooperates with SETI, setting up the public for the return of the evil fallen angels from before the Flood as their saviors.
// Most scientists agree that a finding like this (intelligent ET life) would alter and transform the status quo in many ways–what would be its effect on our society–our science, our technology, or our religion?
So for me detecting another civilization is a way of coming to a better understanding of who we are as human beings. It would mean a chance to see whether the ways of knowing that we’ve developed here on earth—our math, our science, our ways of expressing ourselves, our music, our art–are they somehow tapping into something that goes beyond earth or are they uniquely ours?
The discovery would be on the same level as those of Copernicus and Darwin and as of the transforming events in human history. However it will be decades before people get used to the idea that we are not alone in the universe, and its real meaning becomes deeply ingrained as occurred with the heliocentric cosmology and biological evolution… //
–Douglas A. Vakoch, Ph.D., SETI
This photo of a 29-inch-long footprint was reported in the New York Journal, August 30, 1896. It was one of a series of left-right prints found with footprints of Pleistocene mammals on the island of Victoria in northern Canada, which is isolated enough to be a hideout of Bigfoot. Some scientists believed it to be the footprint of a giant human, but others rejected that and said it had been made by known animals.
The north magnetic pole is moving at a more rapid rate, and some think that this may be precursor of a disastrous reversal of the north and south magnetic poles. That has not happened since the Flood several thousand years ago, and it seems doubtful that God will pour out that kind of disaster on us again. Note that the article about pole reversal is dependent on evolutionary theory for its dating, so we can be sure the dating is wrong.
We recently had the birthdays of two men who sold the paradigm that human perception (“science”), not the Biblical God, is that which defines reality. They were Charles Darwin, on February 12, and Galileo Galilei, on February 15. Vincent Cheung puts them in perspective for us.
Science is People
Science commands so much respect in our society that most Christians seem to think that even God must answer to it in order for him to retain any credibility. When they preach to Buddhists, they do not argue that the Christian faith is just a stronger form of Buddhism. When they confront the cults, they never attempt to portray Christ as the chief cult leader, or the supreme Satanist. Yet when they address those who trust in science, they are driven by a degrading eagerness to offer the Christian faith as more scientific than the alternatives. Without argument, Christians accept that science discovers truth and exposes error, and so the gospel itself must pass its test in order to secure a place in this world.
This is very strange, because Scripture tells us that the spiritual man judges all things, but he himself is judged by no one, and certainly not by the natural man. I am waiting for the scientists to plead with me, and to convince me that their conclusions are Christian! Science is not God. Science is not truth. It is not a thing in itself. It is not some eternal standard of truth by which all things are judged. What is it? Science is people. People guess, choose, make mistakes, scheme for funding, revise their theories, invent explanations, and spiral into utter absurdity. But Jesus Christ is God and Truth. He is rationality incarnate, and he answers to no one. Science must answer to him.
From: book endorsement for another author
These are simulations of BEING on Mars, not the far more cramped and dangerous process of getting there. They still go wrong. Less than complete perfection in space means death. It is like getting to heaven. Only God can make you acceptable to be with Him. One cannot do all that is required.
Why do they not simulate the process of GOING to Mars? That has to happen first. I can only conclude that it is because NASA and the private companies involved are not serious about going to Mars in the first place, and are only using the idea to get people to support them and give them money.